My rights to a safe workplace for my life, liberty and property were denied!!!!!!
I believe that I was refused my right to rebuttal and denied due process..
Read my reply to the "Good Person" lawyer of kinross on the" The Good People Said..." page...
YOU can judge for yourself if I was given a fair shake... lol
Unlike the "Good People" I have presented both sides of the story for you to judge....
Thanks so much for your suggestions and support... John
Handwriting on the wall!!! Naaaaaa just shows the hate and discontent for MSHA and it's Miners Reps!!!!
Handwriting analysis is a wonderful tool for finding the author!!!
Who do you think wrote this???
YOU will soon find out....
Please read my 10 page statement to MSHA on December 18, 2007 after this e-mail.
I sent an e-mail to TVW on Sun 2/22/09 11:10 AM inquiring:
Mr. T V Wey, According to my case.............
I was wondering.
30 CFR § 40.3, 40.4, and 40.5, Representative of Miners
(1. In order to succeed in a discrimination case under the Mine Act, a miner has to present evidence that could convince a judge that: (1) the miner engaged in protected activity (for example, reporting a safety violation), (2) the miner suffered an adverse employment action, and (3) the adverse action was motivated by the protected activity.)
If there is one condition here that I didn't meet according to the,
105(c) Investigation and Processing of Discrimination Complaints Under the provisions of Section 105(c)
Can you please point out this reason?
As I see it if I didn't meet this condition that only means that the definitions are not exact on what is defined as "are protected from retaliation for engaging in safety and/or health related activities, such as identifying hazards, asking for MSHA inspections, or refusing to engage in an unsafe act."
Can you please explain to me what I did or didn't do right to protect me and my fellow workers. I am still not settled in this matter and I feel I was doing the best I could to protect me and my fellow workers. I also feel (in my own opinion)(An opinion is not a fact, because opinions are either not falsifiable, or the opinion has not been proven or verified. If it later becomes proven or verified, it is no longer an opinion, but a fact.) that the investigation was bias and that you as a investigator did not represent (MSHA) and preform your job to protect me as a "representative of miners".... soooooooooooo what is---> "No person shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against or cause to be discharged or cause discrimination against or otherwise interfere with the exercise of the statutory rights of any miner, representative of miners"....
Thanks for your time,
Representative of miners,
E-doc#193557 05/31/2005
John Scott
As of March 3 2009 I have not received an answer..................
Nothing in this discription applied.........
The stupidvisors can call your wife a " Yak hurder" and you just a stupid welder............
and
That they can subject you to any condition that they want as long as the production is not slowed.... YOU tell me....
"Is Gold more important than Safety" or your health.... family... life....
?????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????
According to MSHA it is........
As you have read in my statement to the MSHA investigator it is obvious that the "Good People" didn't get this information.... But now they will soon!!
